visorcentral.com >> Stories >> Business >> e<SUP>2</SUP> vs. normal Energizers

Blast from the past! We stopped updating VisorCentral in late 2002, but feel free to browse around and feel nostalgic. There are 135 reviews and over a thousand articles in our archives. Also check out an even older version of the site.

visorcentral.com >> Stories >> Business
e² vs. normal Energizers


Mon Sep 11, 2000 - 1:41 PM EDT - By James Hromadka

Red Mercury Labs has done testing to see if the e² battery is worth the extra money over normal Energizer batteries. The result? No.

Battery life for the Energizer was 18:25. Battery life for the e² was 20:12 -- an increase of only 9.7%.

The test was done on a Palm III with the backlight off. Click here for the full report.

What has been your results with the e²? Discuss here.

References
Actions

»	Print this page

Recent Additions Stories

»	Palm buys Handspring
»	Innogear sells unique MiniJam Trio on eBay
»	VisorCentral changes focus
»	Comdex 2002
»	Presenter-to-Go reduced to $99
»	$250 for Digital Link owners
»	Preview: Stowaway XT
»	Now Free: Sprint PCS Wireless Web Digital Link
»	Handspring names Ed Colligan President
»	Trade-up to FlashPlus